When a release breaks something for some accounts, the signals arrive scattered across support and the error tracker. Deflekt groups them, ties them to the pull request that caused them and prepares the fix.
A regression rarely breaks everything. It breaks something for the accounts with a specific setting, a specific plan or a specific language. Support sees a few unrelated complaints, the error tracker sees a new exception with a modest count, and nobody connects them to the release that went out the afternoon before.
Each ticket gets handled on its own. A support agent asks for a screenshot, a developer looks at one stack trace, someone suggests clearing the cache. Two days later, an engineer finally notices that all of it started at the same hour, and the hunt through the deploy history begins.
# error tracker and tickets
SlotOverlapError · 43 events · 17 accounts · first seen Thu 16:34
6 tickets (nl, fr, en) mention "cannot confirm"
# code and history
PR #5021 deployed Thu 16:20, slot_service.rb:58 ignores account time zone
# verdict
regression · urgent · bookings blocked, no workaround
The fastest way to fix a regression is to know which pull request caused it.
Once the cause is known, most regressions are a few lines. The expensive part is the time between the release and the moment someone links the symptoms together, and every ticket answered on its own in the meantime.
Deflekt does not revert deploys or push to your main branch. The fix is a pull request that runs through your tests and your review, with the recording playing inside it so the reviewer can see the behaviour change. Replies are drafts until support approves them. If a reviewer leaves a comment or CI fails, Deflekt picks it up in the next round. See how it reads Sentry and GitHub, or how it compares with Sentry Seer.